Man, I missed the question the first time round, must be losing it
Yep, it is privately owned. MNTX markings were just used to transport it to JSR ages ago...
| TwinCitiesRailfan.com http://twincitiesrailfan.com/forums/ |
|
| MNTX caboose question. http://twincitiesrailfan.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1672 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | brahamfireman [ Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | MNTX caboose question. |
I swung by the Jackson st. roundhouse yesterday and found this out back http://brahamfireman.rrpicturearchives. ... ?id=364786 it used to be lettered MNTX 10280, now the MNTX is covered up. also if you look at the numbers on the top of the copula it used to be BN 10860, is it going to be renumber to BN 10860 or is it now going to be BN 10280??? just want to get the info on the photo right. |
|
| Author: | brahamfireman [ Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MNTX caboose question. |
BTT. Anyone??? I am sure andy can answer this anyone seen him lately??? |
|
| Author: | Chris [ Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MNTX caboose question. |
Hey fireman!,, I asked a guy I know about it, he volunteers over there once in a while. He said that particular caboose is privately owned and is stored there while undergoing a restoration. Apparently it is not owned at all by the mtm according to him. |
|
| Author: | RS27 [ Thu Sep 25, 2008 7:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MNTX caboose question. |
Man, I missed the question the first time round, must be losing it Yep, it is privately owned. MNTX markings were just used to transport it to JSR ages ago...
|
|
| Author: | brahamfireman [ Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MNTX caboose question. |
thanks guys. I am going to leave it labeled as BN 10860 since that was the original number. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|